So when MTT (as he was known) began recording as a young conductor, it was natural for him to turn to the Gershwin catalog for material.
Today we will examine some of the fruits of his exploration, in the form of his 1976 LP of the Rhapsody in Blue and An American in Paris. An added attraction is MTT's 1983 recording of the Second Rhapsody, in its original form.
For more about Thomas' life and career, the New York Times had a very good obituary (gift link). Here, it's sufficient to note that he was a gifted conductor, pianist, composer and orchestra builder who was widely admired.
Rhapsody in Blue
The Rhapsody in Blue recording was something of a technical feat at the time. The idea of Columbia producers Tom Shepard and Andrew Kazdin, it featured the original "jazz band" orchestration as conducted by Thomas, accompanying Gershwin himself, with the performance taken from a piano roll the composer had made.
Producing the recording was a chore. The solo piano part on the roll had been augmented by additional notes designed to represent the accompaniment. So the producers laboriously covered over each of those punched accompaniment notes on the roll, leaving just the solo part. MTT then conducted the band while the player piano did its thing.
![]() |
| George Gershwin |
The result is surprisingly effective. Gershwin's brisk pace is different from the somewhat sentimentalized readings that are often heard, and the pungent original Ferde Grofé orchestration is right in step with that approach. The members of the "Columbia Jazz Band" are unidentified except for clarinetist Charles Russo, who is credited with the famous opening clarinet glissando.
The recording is vivid, although the solo instruments had a tendency to pop out of the background in a different acoustic from the piano. I've added a small amount of natural reverb to the band (not the piano) to address this issue.
The Rhapsody of course premiered in 1924 in a performance with Paul Whiteman's orchestra. The composer and Whiteman's band then recorded the work in truncated form for Victor. Because the performance was abbreviated, and because it was done via a recording horn rather than the electrical method that would soon come into use, it has been at times overlooked. That recording appeared on this blog some time ago, and I have now revisited the sound, which is one of the best acoustic recordings I have heard. You can find it here. You'll notice that Gershwin is less relentless in this performance than he is on the piano roll - although fast tempos were more the norm than the exception in his pianism. That post linked above also includes several of his piano recordings, which tend to be quite brisk.
Gershwin also recorded the Rhapsody electrically a few years later, but I believe that was with the expanded "symphonic" arrangement that Grofé had prepared.
An American in Paris
Thomas and Columbia used the New York Philharmonic for the recording of Gershwin's 1928 piece An American in Paris. Rightfully so - the conductor of one of the orchestra's, predecessors, Walter Damrosch of the New York Symphony had commissioned the work. This time the composer wrote his own, highly effective orchestrations, auto horns and all.
![]() |
| Michael Tilson Thomas in 1985 |
An American in Paris is not afflicted by the urtext confusion that besets Rhapsody in Blue and its successor, the Second Rhapsody.
MTT conducts a charming, idiomatic performance of the piece, which was well recorded in Columbia's 30th Street Studio, a former church.
Gershwin himself appears on an early recording of An American in Paris, playing the celeste while Nathaniel Shilkret conducted. On that one - which can be heard on the same set as the acoustic Rhapsody - the Victor engineers emphasized the auto horns and xylophone to a distracting degree.
Second Rhapsody
Gershwin's unloved (not by me!) sequel to Rhapsody in Blue - the Second Rhapsody - started out as an assignment for the 1931 Janet Gaynor film Delicious. Gershwin was excited by the music he composed, which turned out to be much longer than was needed for the film. So he produced a cut down version for filmic use which came to be called Rhapsody in Rivets. Gershwin had the full Second Rhapsody recorded for his own purposes, and then it languished.
When the piece was finally published in the early 1950s, the publisher had had it reorchestrated by Robert McBride. So the original had seldom been heard until Thomas and Columbia had new parts made from the autograph score and recorded it with the Los Angeles Philharmonic in 1982-83 sessions.
At the time of he release, MTT sat for an interview with David Patrick Stearns for High Fidelity, which turned into a gushing article in which Thomas claimed - somewhat incomprehensibly - to have a "Gershwin gyroscope" and the writer posited that MTT's was the first recording of Gershwin's original version.
Trouble was, it wasn't the first. Gershwin biographer Edward Jablonski wrote the magazine to point out the composer's own run through, which had been released much later on. Also, Columbia - MTT's own label - had recorded the original version in 1949 with Oscar Levant and the Morton Gould Orchestra. Levant had championed the piece when it was nearly forgotten.How does MTT compare with Levant? Well, the later version is certainly good and well worth hearing. But Oscar's is more strongly characterized and makes a better case for this fine music. It also provides a more truthful impression of an orchestra in a real acoustic, although the LA recording is certainly not bad.
The Levant-Gould version was one of the first records I ever posted, back in 2008. I've remastered the sound on that 10-inch LP, which includes the also-unloved "I Got Rhythm" Variations and the better regarded Three Preludes.
The interview and Jablonski riposte are included in the download, along with relevant reviews.
LINK to Michael Tilson Thomas recordings
LINK to Oscar Levant recording





25 comments:
Many thanks for this share. I'm sure that I was lucky enough to see MTT in San Francisco, London and Liverpool. All your work is very much appreciated. Cheers.
Anon - Fortunate indeed! Thanks for your gracious note.
Thanks for posting these. Although there is no urtext confusion in A in P, there are some small sections that were edited out at some point after the premiere. Also, the bicycle horns are actually meant to sound different pitches than those in the printed score. Check out the recording by Langree/Cincinnati to hear what Gershwin actually intended.
Do you think a player piano recording reflects what a pianist would actually sound like if he were playing a regular piano? Does the recording machinery dictate any changes in a performance? (Am I back to observation of an event affecting the outcome of said event? It always comes down to that somehow...)
Thanks for this, Buster!
Thanks so much for both Gershwin recordings. I've always liked the MTT Rhapsody, even though I've wondered if the tempos on the piano roll were due more to Gershwin's delight in solo improvisation, than how it was performed with the full ensemble. One way or the other, MTT's band is amazingly agile in the off-to-the-races sections.
Perdido - Thanks, excellent information!
Ernie - Great observation. The tempos are subject to any number of practical considerations. For an orchestra, even the hall size and resonance can change dynamics and tempo. The impact of the acoustic recording process is well known; I would imagine that player piano recording might have its own issues. That said, the tempos of Gershwin's other solo recordings - made electrically - tend to be brisk.
Stephen - That well could be! Thanks for your note.
Dave From Ardmore thanks you for this trubute to MTT and the inclusion of Oscar Levant's reccording of the 2nd Rhapsody. I'm still puzzled, though. Does the Levant-Gould recording use Gershwin's original orchestration? Is there one? I've ong believed that no such score exists and everything is reconstruction. Am I wrong? By the way, the use of the truncated rhapsody in the final sequence of "Delicious" is, in my eyes, early noir. Indeed, the cinematography is almost expressionist. It has been released as a self-contained work conducted by John Mauceri. leading the Hollywood Bowl Orchestra on a Philips album called "The Gershwins in Hollywood." This nugget makes it clear that Gershwin was pushing the envelope. No wonder it is said that he asked Alban Berg for lessons.
Dave - From what I've read there is an autograph score and there were parts (which presumably Levant and Gould used), which were subsequently lost. This was before the score was published. The publisher had it re-orchestrated by McBride. I haven't heard that Mauceri recording - have to seek it out!
Great
Muchas, muchas, Gracias
Thanks, gimpiero!
Anon - My pleasure!
Gershwin, Levant, Wills, and Brown, what a great start to the month!
Thanks! Now I just have to find that elusive Oscar Levant and the Texas Playboys record.
I've long admired Michael Tilson Thomas, so I'm especially grateful for this wonderful tribute to him. The music, the commentary, and the gift link to his NYT obituary all made for a tasteful and generous share, Buster. Not to mention all the effort you spend both posting and fielding everyone's questions and comments. Thanks again - and rest in peace, Michael.
Thanks as always, mike, for your generous comments!
MTT / Gershwin will remain always one of the references (his set of Gershwin'w Overtures is also a great moment...); the Rhapsody was quite a shock when released (because of the so different original orchestration as well as because of the tempi due the piano rolls with Gerswhin his arrangement for solo piano). It remains amazing and fresh today.
Many thanks also for the Levant in new sound, a fantastic recording with the support of the so musical Morton Gould !
I had the opportunity to meet twice MTT (a real multi-faceted musician as well as a kind person) in Miami where he was chief conductor of the New World SO and quite remember our long passionate discussion about Carl Ruggles. We will miss him for a long time.
Jean - A great memory, discussing Ruggles with MTT. I think I have the set the conductor made with the Buffalo orchestra. Thanks for mentioning the New World SO - it was one of his most important achievements.
Ha! Don’t give AI any ideas...although....
What a lovely tribute to MTT. Another excellent post that provides important context and history to make the listening of these recordings so delightful.
When I read of MTT's passing, this was the recording I played. I was a wee thing when it was released and I loved it with the passion of youth: I wore out the recording from repeated plays.
I want to thank you for this most lovely gift. It made my day, as we once said.
Anon - Well, it's reciprocal, because your kind comment made my day! Thanks so much.
Hi Buster, while I have heard several versions of both Rhapsody in Blue and An American in Paris before, these versions were just as lovely as others I have heard.
I was really impressed, though, with the Second Rhapsody. It is a real pity that it was not as popular in its own way.
I will go ahead and combine them as track 1 and track 2, so I can hear them back-to-back. Maybe this might be worth listening to, as in a cohesive form?
Anyway, thanks again for sharing.
Later, I will listen to the Levant and Gould album you shared.
Hi Bryan - The Second Rhapsody is a good piece - happy to hear you like it as well!
Post a Comment