![]() |
| Frédéric Chopin |
Today we'll listen to two versions of the composer's first concerto, one with the orchestrations as Chopin wrote them, and one with revised scoring by another notable composer, Mili Balakirev.
These performances are notable for other reasons as well, as will be explained in what follows.
The Pollini-Kletzki Recording
First up is a performance that makes use of the orchestrations as the composer wrote them, although I'm not smart enough to know whether conductor Paul Kletzki did or did not revise them a bit.It is one of the great recordings of all time, in my estimation. The pianist is the 18-year-old Maurizio Pollini, fresh from his triumph at the 1960 International Chopin Competition. That's the one where Artur Rubinstein is said to have told the other judges that Pollini was better than any of them.
![]() |
| Maurizio Pollini at the Chopin Competition |
Listening to this performance, it's easy to understand why. Pollini's skill and musicianship are astonishing. Here are a few comments from The Gramophone's Roger Fiske, all of which I agree with:
[Pollini] gives a spine-tingling performance of this magnificent music, and if you have not in the past thought it magnificent, listen to this performance and be converted.
Orchestral accompaniment and balance are worthy of the solo playing. I have never heard the opening given with such fire. The orchestra stays on its toes throughout, and Kletzki makes a splendid job of following every variation of tempo.
Thus the triumphant success of this record is a team effort, but the last word must be for the soloist. Directions like agitato, espressivo, and perhaps above all leggierissimo extract an instinctive response from him of a kind which very few pianists can parallel and which Chopin would surely have loved. I do not ever expect to hear the concerto played better.
![]() |
| Paul Kletzki |
Pollini is so commanding that it might be ȧ surprise to learn that he was not secure about his playing. At the time, Charles Reid reported in High Fidelity the following drama in the recording studio:
Came the first playback. After a few bars Pollini put his head in his hands. "What's wrong ?" asked Kletzki. "Nothing much," said Pollini. "My playing is very bad, that's all."
Kletzki clapped him on the back. "You've nothing to worry about," he tried to reassure him. "If that's bad playing, all I can say is that I've heard playing five times worse on many a successful first record."
Pollini refused to be persuaded. When the others went out for a meal he stayed on in the studio, sat down at the keyboard, and, frowning doggedly, began to play scales and arpeggios. The recording was finished in two and a half sessions. The master tape differed little from the playback which had provoked Pollini's despair. The young man's attitude at the end was one of stoical resignation. His EMI mentors were jubilant.
There's more. In another report a few years later, Reid wrote:
In the autumn of the same year, Pollini came back to the Abbey Road studios here and recorded the Chopin études, which were scheduled for issue on two discs. Again he buried his head when he heard the tapes; again everybody else was congratulatory. But this time the young man was adamant as well as irreconcilable. He refused to approve the tapes, went home to Milan, and that was that.
The story goes on, which you can read in clippings in the download. Suffice to say that Pollini was always an idiosyncratic character. Also a brilliant pianist, which you can hear in a recording of Beethoven's Fourth Concerto from years later, which I shared following the pianist's death.
LINK to the Pollini-Kletzki recording
The Gulda-Boult Recording
This record is the one that started me thinking about this post. Until I came across it not long ago, I was unaware that a recording with a revised orchestration had ever been issued. In fact, on the record's packaging it's hard to even find any evidence that this is the Balakirev edition. A careful reading of the notes yields this statement, after the obligatory slam of the composer's "clumsy" orchestration: "This recording features the attractive, stylish arrangement penned by Balakirev." Rather like Chopin in a new frock.
Actually, this is a very fine record in its own right, with the fascinating Friedrich Gulda and the reliable Adrian Boult. And Balakirev's orchestrations are not as block-like as Chopin's, not that it makes a hell of a lot of difference. The interest is in the remarkable solo part.
![]() |
| Friedrich Gulda |
In reviewing the 1954 performance in The Gramophone, Trevor Harvey, himself a conductor, did not seem aware that the orchestrations had been changed - or at least he did not mention the fact.
He did opine that, "It is a very sound performance, with a good deal of brilliance to it and some nicely sensitive singing tone too ... I think I can safely say, the best yet - and, indeed, most commendable."
Gulda was an exceptional character in his right. He had a side career as a jazz pianist, and an accomplished one at that. In that guise, he appeared on this blog many years ago via the 1956 LP Friedrich Gulda at Birdland, in the company of some noted jazz musicians - Phil Woods, Seldon Powell, Idrees Sulieman and Jimmy Cleveland. The pianist sounds as home in "A Night in Tunisia" as he does in Chopin. The Birdland LP has been newly remastered for this occasion.LINK to the Gulda-Boult recording
![]() |
| Ad in High Fidelity, September 1956 |














































.jpg)



