
These come to us from Maurice Abravanel and the Utah Symphony in a 1978 recording. It was among the last that the conductor would make before his retirement the following year.
![]() |
Maurice Abravanel |
Like the other late Utah-Abravanel discs that have been presented here, this is a fine achievement, well recorded and rewarding to hear.
As I wrote a year ago, The Testament of Freedom was not without its detractors among critics. But David Hall of Stereo Review was a proponent, even if he had his doubts about the Utah performance: "The deeply moving texts for men's chorus from the writings of Thomas Jefferson can stir American souls in much the same way that the patriotic texts for Prokofiev's Alexander Nevsky can affect a contemporary Russian. Regrettably, however, Maurice Abravanel simply fails to give the music the rhythmic vitality it needs."
My own view is different: I found the Hanson to be overdone, and the Abravanel to be more effective because it is less bombastic. A year ago I quoted a review from The New Records that summarizes my feeling about the piece: "Mr. Thompson's work manages to be impressive without being melodramatically sensational and, from a technical standpoint, is quite well-wrought."
![]() |
Randall Thompson |
Hall of Stereo Review explains the genesis of the other work on the Angel LP: "Thompson's First Symphony seems an odd piece on first hearing because it is 'unsymphonic' - for instance, it makes no use of sonata form. The jacket notes fail to explain the reasons for this, but in his article 'The Music of Randall Thompson' (Musical Quarterly, January 1949), Elliott Forbes tells us that this symphony was an outgrowth of the composer's setting of two odes of Horace for soloist, chorus, and orchestra (they were planned as a sequel to his Five Odes of Horace completed in 1924). Thompson evidently despaired of the new odes ever coming to performance and therefore in 1929 rescored them for orchestra alone as the First Symphony."
Hall finds the first symphony to be inferior to Thompson's second (which has appeared on this blog in a reading led by Dean Dixon). To me, comparisons like this are curiously pointless. The first symphony, here in what appears to be its first recording, is a fine, ingratiating work in its own right, although much different from the second.
The composer's own view of the work, as conveyed in the liner notes to the Angel recording: "My First Symphony was written during the years 1925-29. This was an age of exuberance and high spirits between the two World Wars. This period represents an emergence of a feeling that American music must sound American. The Symphony is sometimes reflective and sometimes tinged with sentiment and tenderness, but it is not problematic and is not a contest between comedy and tragedy. It is what is known as 'pure' music, having no story to tell, only a series of musical sections, displaying reflection, serenity, vitality and intensity."
Born in 1899, Thompson would live for another six years following this recording. He is most associated with Harvard, although he also taught at Wellesley, Virginia, and the Curtis Institute, where he was president for a term.