15 October 2016

More Beethoven from Walter, Plus Reups



The title of this blog says something about 10-inch records, so I guess it is about time I got around to posting an example of that species. This one is not just any 10-incher, but the first classical LP of that size, Beethoven’s Symphony No. 8, as performed by Bruno Walter and the Philharmonic-Symphony of New York.

From a 1943 ad
Walter also had the honor of conducting the first classical LP of any type, the Mendelssohn violin concerto with Nathan Milstein, a 12-incher issued as ML 4001. The Beethoven symphony had the lowest number assigned to 10-inch classics, ML 2001.

While those two LPs were new in 1948, the recordings were not. The Mendelssohn was a transfer of a 1945 78 set, the second of Milstein’s five recordings of the concerto. (The first, with the Cleveland Orchestra and Rodzinski, remains unissued.) Walter’s Beethoven symphony dated from as far back as April 1942. It was the third in his ongoing mono cycle that commenced with No. 5 and the Eroica in 1941. I’ve been presenting the symphonies here from time to time.

In the early 40s, Columbia was doing its New York orchestral recordings in Liederkranz Hall. The results here are resonant to the brink of boominess, but as always with Walter’s readings, the performances are well worth hearing.

Now for some reups, all the result of requests. All these have been remastered and are generally in much better sound that my original efforts.

Copland - Piano Concerto, Barber - Violin Concerto. These were both first recordings – excellent ones, too - the Barber from 1950 with Louis Kaufman and Walter Goehr and the Copland from 1951 with Leo Smit and the composer.

Warner's Color TV Fashion Show. Perhaps the most obscure record I’ve ever offered, this is a promo sent to stores in advance of a 1956 television show touting women’s undergarments. Songs by Michael Brown, whose greatest hit was “Lizzie Borden”.

Humoresque (soundtrack). Franz Waxman chopped and channeled various classics for this 1946 Joan Crawford potboiler, with the high (or low) point being his transformation of the Tristan and Isolde prelude into a semi-concerto for Isaac Stern and Oscar Levant.

Boult Conducts and Rehearses Britten. This is actually two records from the same 1956 sessions with Sir Adrian Boult and the LPO. The first contains stereo recordings of the Peter Grimes Sea Interludes and Passacaglia and the Young Person’s Guide, sans narration. The second contains a narrated Young Person’s Guide and a rehearsal recording with Boult, both in mono.

The links above lead to the original posts. Links to the recordings themselves can be found both in the comments there and in the comments to this post.

9 comments:

  1. Links (Apple lossless):

    Beethoven - Symphony No. 8 (Walter)
    https://www.mediafire.com/?908krbvbxm10xga

    Copland - Piano Concerto, Barber - Violin Concerto
    https://www.mediafire.com/?bcvnc4hvg9069li

    Warner's Color TV Fashion Show
    https://www.mediafire.com/?fechlsfdjcdwhk8

    Humoresque
    https://www.mediafire.com/?usqmlwokfxq2g5b

    Boult Conducts and Rehearses Britten
    https://www.mediafire.com/?385nw8yt4ivwji1

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am going to bare my blackened soul and admit to a SHAMELESS, unjustified piece of artistic license in which I DARED to modify a Bruno Walter performance.

      In 1939 and '40, Walter gave a series of splendid performances with the NBC Symphony, of which I most fondly recall the Bruckner 4th and Mahler 1st: much more energetic and spontaneous sounding than his later stereo records.

      Well, the one big failure was (IMO) his Tchaikovsky Fifth. When I heard he had done the Fifth Symphony with the NBC I was at first thrilled, as I'm a "Bruno Walter completist". But, ah me: he used what I'd call "a rehearsal tempo" for much of the last movement: JUST PERVERSELY SLOW AND STILTED (with additional slowing-down tempo rubato at times: over the top!) The earlier movements (especially the first, which is especially impulsive and thrilling in the development section and coda) are, however, truly marvelous.

      I tried to listen to this over the years, and COULDN'T TAKE IT.

      One day I had a *horrible* thought. Could I use my audio editor to speed up the tempo of sections of that one alleged flawed final movement, retaining proper pitch? I tried to do it, minimally, sort of splitting the difference between the draggy original and, say, Josef Krips' tempo for his old Decca/London stereo recording with the Vienna Phil. (I figured that Krips, a Walter accolyte, might not be too much different from the central European norm, compared to the hell-for-leather Slavic conductors like Koussy and Mravinsky.)

      I am GLAD this expires in 30 days; I do not relish having this around to shame me FOREVER.

      Think of it as a brain-fart, a momentary aberration caused by an errant cosmic ray colliding with my cerebral cortex. The authentic performance is on several CDs and numerous blogs, so if you really wish to get this back into WALTER'S concept -- which I reject as being totally inappropriate IN THE FINALE only -- it's easy to do that. I've included extra files: the unaltered last movement, plus a sample of the un-edited opening of the symphony, revealing the damage done over the years to the original acetate disks. (I've added a 'spurious' cover image, cropped and modified from a lovely color image from one of Walter's old fifties Columbia records.)

      Though Toscanini "allowed" his protege Guido Cantelli to play the Fifth later at NBC, he is reputed to have hated this work, compared to his love for the Sixth. I just wonder if AT was influenced negatively by the Bruno Walter interpretation! Maybe after hearing the straightforward version by Guido, he may have eventually changed his mind.

      I hereby give my blessing to a couple of celebrated Long Island enthusiasts (an avid collector, and a record producer) to denounce me forever as a rogue and peasant slave! (But, they already think that anyway.)

      I might also ad that back in the early 2000s I made what were, at the time, some fairly heroic efforts to remove the billions of ticks and pops on the first (sort of "gray-market) issue; no doubt later versions have used CEDAR or other software to get rid of those gouges, spits, blats, and clunks. (Maybe Toscanini HIMELF did them; he kept aircheck disks of the orchestra but according to historical accounts, he was DEATH to any phonograph record ever within his reach! Actually, that's just a joke, as I know that's not true--as I've been informed that the original disks were from the Library of Congress collection.)

      The ripping sounds removed, I decided to go whole-hog and alter the Studio 8H acoustic a bit, and make the bass slightly richer: a sop to modern listeners who weren't imprinted on antique acoustical records sans any ambience (maybe the NBC engineers had this misfortune.) So chalk up the entire grotesque production, here to the utter irreponsibility and hubris of an audio restorer-run-amuck.

      https://www64.zippyshare.com/v/SSCDnGpd/file.html

      (50 MB, zipped mp3s, plus unrelated Walter cover pic)

      Delete
    2. Very amusing! I can't abide the 8H sound and have had my fill of the Tchaikovsky 5th, but I am sure I will enjoy this.

      Delete
    3. BTW, Buster:

      I understand that the LIVE concert by the Philharmonic-Symphony of New York, of the premiere by Walter of the revised version of the Barber First, once appeared in a multi-disk set that is now, apparently defunct. Walter recorded the work for Columbia 78s -- I had a mint copy of the Masterworks shellacs, incidentally -- and later it was re-issued on LP in a Japanese Columbia set (with the 1941 Eroica 78s by BW in a badly botched transfer, with buzz NOT on the original masters), and of course years later on CD in the Sony Walter Edition, sounding best of all issues.

      However, critics object to the tempi of parts of the performance; it is said that Walter had to speed up to fit the music onto the few available sides of the original 78 rpm release. I believe it's also been claimed that the preceding broadcast was, in these spots, considerably broader and closer to the composer's intentions.

      Have this one, Buster? I'd surely love to encounter it!

      8H Haggis

      Delete
    4. That's an interesting one that I unfortunately don't have.

      Delete
  2. Thanks a million Buster for all these posts: in general, I prefer Bruno Walter conducting NYPO than the stereo remakes with Columbia SO (for tempi and character). This LP confirms this....
    The Copland/Barber is amazing. So does the refined and well-balanced Boult/Britten, definitely one of the best versions I ever heard.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi centuri - Thanks as always for your insightful comments. I too prefer the earlier Walter recordings.

    ReplyDelete

  4. I don't know much about Bruno Walter but I do enjoy the Beethoven. Thank you Buster!

    ReplyDelete