![]() |
1945 Life Magazine ad - click to enlarge |
I just transferred this recording, and enjoyed the results so much that I am rush releasing it, as it were, for your enjoyment.
"It" in this case is the Brahms piano concerto no. 2 with the great Rudolf Serkin. The work was something of a specialty of the pianist: he recorded it at least four times - three times with the present accomplices, the Philadelphia Orchestra and Eugene Ormandy.
This particular edition is the first, recorded in the Academy of Music on March 15, 1945. It was followed by 1956 and 1960 efforts, and a 1966 go-around with George Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra.
![]() |
Original LP cover |
I own two pressings of the recording, with distinctly different sound. This transfer is from the first pressing, which, while not really dry sounding, is distinctly less resonant and glamorous sounding than a later version, which was "enhanced" with reverb. It's fascinating how much different Serkin sounds when he has been aided by the engineer. Reverb is very much of a universal phenomenon these days, which may be why one contemporary orchestral recording sounds pretty much like another. I would prefer to have Serkin and the Philadelphians served without condiments, and that's what we have here.
![]() |
Serkin in 1943 |
The sound here is just to my taste, although there is some slight wobble here and there due to a less-than-ideally flat pressing. The orchestral backing is very fine. I want to be sure to mention the superb cello solo in the slow movement, which presumably is by then-principal Samuel Mayes.
Link (Apple lossless):
ReplyDeletehttp://rapidshare.com/files/1303275176/Brahms%20-%20Piano%20Concerto%20No.%202%20(Serkin_%20PO-Ormandy).zip
Hi Buster, is there any chance you would have the original cast album (if there is one) of Wonderful Town? I have just finished reading a book called Harry Truman's Excellent Adventure which mentions the Trumans saw the show in NYC in 1953. It starred Rosalind Russell and Edie Adams. I've found the 2003 revival but would like to hear something like the Trumans experienced.
ReplyDeleteHi - I am sure I have it somewhere, but it's commercially available and I usually stay away from such items.
ReplyDeleteThat's cool. Thanks, Buster.
DeleteThanks for this great version.
ReplyDeleteDid the same forces also recorded Brahms PC1 at the same period? and how many times did they record PC1 together?
You may visit http://elbaulcoleccionista.blogspot.com/2013/04/brahms-por-serkin-y-szell-nuevo-link.html
DeleteYou may visit http://elbaulcoleccionista.blogspot.com/2013/04/brahms-por-serkin-y-szell-nuevo-link.html
DeleteCenturi - According to Michael Gray's discography, Serkin recorded it in 1946 with Pittsburgh and Reiner, 1952 with Cleveland and Szell, 1961 with Philadelphia and Ormandy, and 1968 with Cleveland and Szell again. I imagine I have one or more of these, but honestly have no idea where they might be. I have it in my mind to transfer some of the Pittsburgh-Reiner recordings, so I will dub the Serkin recording if I come across it.
ReplyDeleteBuster, I'm very happy that you posted your copy of the first pressing rather than the later one with added reverb. I recall reading somewhere that Columbia added the reverb at that time by playing back the recordings in a stairwell at their headquarters building in NYC. I've never liked the sound of those "enhanced" versions.
ReplyDeleteThis one isn't as pronounced as some I've heard, but it's interesting how much the reverb changes the feel of the performance.
ReplyDeleteThanks for posting. Think I'll give it a listen right away.
ReplyDeleteThanks! Grabbing this already for its nice covers and colour(iz)ed ads! ;-)
ReplyDeleteThanks also for the info on the re-release and its "enhancing" procedure... !
Thanks for putting up this beautiful dream of a record.
ReplyDeleteBrewsk Litovsk - You are welcome. Serkin's earliest Brahms PC1 is coming up.
ReplyDeleteIs it possible to reup this recording? The Rapidshare links are long gone!
ReplyDeleteanagy - Yes, I can get to it in the next few days.
ReplyDeleteThank you so much. It will be very instructive to me to hear Serkin's earlier thoughts about this concerto.
DeleteRemastered version (Apple lossless):
ReplyDeletehttps://mega.co.nz/#!PMV1ha7L!cUuXpX_kZxrowliQahSzxJCS5C0KgvEbWF9FHLiocZ4
http://www.mediafire.com/download/t2764336tv8iipm/Brahms_-_Piano_Concerto_No._2_(Serkin,_PO-Ormandy)_(remastered).zip
Buster, I simply *must* say that your work here is particularly justified, compared to a dreadful and peculiar sounding transfer I had from the Internet Archive collection (by someone named Reeder); he used a strange harsh EQ and added some "stereophonic echo" of very short duration to "spread out" the sound--very unnatural and in NO way representing the rich fullness of the original, as YOU have reproduced it!
DeleteMy quid pro quo is an absolutely forceful and riveting Schumann Second Symphony, conducted by Ormandy with the Minneapolis Symphony for Victor 78s of the mid-30s. This came from a certain blog that usually uses really pristine disks; but unfortunately its producer seems to have had a nearly-trashed copy with severe "blasting" due apparently to groove wear from a worn or heavy needle.
I loved this terrific performance--but could BARELY stand to listen to it. His purist transfer techniques, usually laudible, left in billions of ticks and pops and, of course, each coarse, distorted "blast" in all the loudest passages. However, this is the one exception on his blog that had such defects; 99% of the time his careful work is admirable.
I used some special techniques to 're-shape' the sound envelope on only those affected waveforms, plus a lot of modern digital declicking--and some EQ and NR, I admit, to try to reduce the constant 'hash'. Yes, it's no longer purist, and no doubt an infinitely more satisfying job could be done from a mint copy of the shellacs, if one could EVER be found. Until that happens...well, I hope at least a few persons might be able to share my thrills with this superb rendering! There is still a lot of remaining grit and some IM distortion in the passages I've tried to 'help'; but I've heard infinitely worse (and even from some of my own oldest worn 78 sets.)
I never heard a subsequent Ormandy performance: could he have matched this in the fifties, sixties, or seventies? However once I encountered a radio b'cast of a Jorge Mester/Philly performance of the symphony: and it did seem to have something of the same lean, lithe, dramatic approach--if not quite the same youthful dynamism.
https://www65.zippyshare.com/v/Bz42wjlL/file.html
(31 MB zipped files, mp3)
The cover pic I have included is not the boring boilerplate Victor 78 set standard issue of the time, but rather a little fanciful mosaic I've pieced together from images of some old contemporary Red Seal disks, and Ormandy as he appeared around the same time he made these records, c.1936.
File availability limited to only 30 days after upload date of 7/23/18.
ReplyDeleteThank you for another fine reup Buster!