Let's discuss them in the order of their recording.
Piano Concerto No. 2
Brahms' Concerto No. 2 is an extraordinary work, quite long due to its encompassing four movements rather than the usual three, and demanding for the soloist.As was his pattern, Solomon surmounts all the challenges seemingly without difficulty, and without ever drawing attention to his own virtuosity. He is of one mind with the conductor, the Russian-born Issay Dobrowen (1891-1953). The interplay in the fourth movement is something to hear.
![]() |
Issay Dobrowen |
I enjoyed Dobrowen's work here and will be transferring some of his recordings of Russian music for a future post.
This recording comes from Abbey Road, April 29-May 1, 1947.
Piano Concerto No. 1
For the first piano concerto, HMV, the orchestra, conductor Rafael Kubelík and Solomon moved to the more resonant acoustic of Kingsway Hall, with sessions on September 3-5, 1952. For whatever reason, HMV didn't get around to releasing the recording in the UK until 1955, although it seems to have come out in the US somewhat earlier.As was often the case with Solomon's concerto recordings, the critics were split in their verdicts. The Gramophone: "It seems to me that the combination of Solomon and Kubelík could have produced a superlative recording, but there must have been a lack of watchfulness in the making of the disc, for there are many flaws in balance and interpretation." Stereo Review: "The performance is certainly among the most outstanding on disc and will be the very first choice of many listeners. Solomon virtually owned this music: it held no problems for him technically. and he was obviously completely at one with its musical message."
![]() |
Rafael Kubelík |
At the time of the recording, Kubelík (1914-96) was about to embark on his final season as the music director of the Chicago Symphony, an unhappy tenure that lasted just three years. As for this recording, Harris Goldsmith wrote in High Fidelity, "Rafael Kubelík conducts sympathetically, although I don't sense the extraordinary meeting of minds evident in the B flat concerto with Dobrowen." I think that's a fair comment.
I believe I have presented most of Solomon's concerto discs here in the relatively recent past. He also recorded the Tchaikovsky first concerto (twice), Mozart concertos and the Scriabin concerto. I have have the Tchaikovsky and Mozart recordings and plan to transfer them. The Scriabin work is not in my collection.
As was the case with a few of my recent posts, I've presented the Brahms concertos in ambient stereo, which adds some air around the mono signal and brings it forward. These transfers came from a very clean HMV reissue from the 1970s, as found in my collection (literally - I forgot I had it). The sound is remarkably good.
The download includes several reviews and a 1949 article on Solomon from The Gramophone.
![]() |
Ad in The Gramophone, September 1955 (click to enlarge) |
Links (Apple lossless):
ReplyDeletePiano Concerto No. 2
https://mega.nz/file/LBFkBTKS#wz07XP6oR79lfAOIVrcgS8sg1L_SExWxsvCdZFfwCVM
Piano Concerto No. 1
https://mega.nz/file/OIljVKxY#yralRHgoXUJqsVjPHxzRuhxvt8UGk_OP936zJIYVT8E
Much appreciated Buster.
ReplyDeleteMany thanks for these shares - really enjoy all the information you impart from your research.
ReplyDeleteCheers.
Thanks, rev.b and Douglas!
ReplyDeleteBuster, many thanks as always.
ReplyDeleteMy pleasure, Peter.
DeleteThese recordings of these (outstanding) concertos have always been among my favorites; your beautiful transfers definitely add a plus. To me, Solomon's fresh tempi together with his constant musicality are a reference. Thanks so much !
ReplyDeleteHi Jean - Thanks for the nice compliment, and as always for your pertinent observations!
DeleteI owned both of these items back in the day.
ReplyDeleteI have to admit that Concerto 1 fizzles out. If any piece benefits from a hell-bent-for-leather approach, this is the one.
Given that Curzon, Fleisher, and Serkin all recorded it with Szell (not to mention Katchen with Monteux), it is no wonder that this recording faded away.
(I believe there is a live recording, probably in poor sound, where Solomon plays with more fire. Maazel? The old Rococo label from Yonge Street, Toronto? Ring a bell?
There should be many live concerts with Solomon but the BBC was the BBC.
They almost wiped the Monty Python broadcasts.
For some perverse reason, recent recordings seem to have adopted the elephantine Glenn Gould approach.
My own favorite is the William Kappell aircheck, even though Mitropoulos and the orchestra have their scruffy moments.
Concerto No. 2 is far better, although mono sound relegated it to the back catalog.
I am glad that your ambient sound is applied lightly. That Andrew Rose guy's XR stuff bears the same relation to cheese that processed cheese bears to cheese.
BTW, after moaning and groaning loudly about the injustice, Norton finally removed Big10 from the Death List.
What was that about?
Charlot,
DeleteMy own favorite is one you mentioned - Fleisher-Szell. I've never seen a live Solomon recording of the piece. It likely would not be with Maazel, because he was only 26 when Solomon had his stroke.
I like the ambient sound effect, done properly. I don't know what Pristine uses, but mine is a conservative application of the Ozone Imager 2 plug-in for iZotope RX 10.
Just so you know - I had to pay a tidy sum to Norton so it would stop holding my site hostage from you.
FYI - I can publish the mono versions on request.
DeleteIt turns out there are at least two live recordings of Solomon playing the Brahms 1st. I just listened to both of them on YouTube:
ReplyDelete1. A 1954 broadcast with the Berlin Philharmonic conducted by Eugen Jochum. It was briefly available on the Tahra label.
2. A 1956 version with the RAI Torino orchestra conducted by, as I vaguely recollected, Lorin Maazel. I think it may still be available on the Guild label. Maazel was 26 at the time and, considering that he had already conducted the NBCSO at age 11,
Neither is a hi-fi spectacular, although the slightly tubby sound from Germany is definitely preferable to the glassy acoustic from Turin and of course, the BPO is the better orchestra.
Maazel, unfortunately, was in one of his fussy moods and the first two movements are molto ponderoso. Solomon copes as well as he can with the slow tempi and finally is let off of the leash in the final movement.
Jochum conducts well and takes the third movement coda at a hell of clip. If my ears do not deceive me, Solomon has one fleeting finger slip but is otherwise is in great form.
I failed to mention another favorite, the Rubinstein/Reiner which was not issued in stereo until long after its initial mono release.
Norton should be ashamed of itself.
Charlot,
DeleteThanks for the tips re: Solomon live recordings. Sounds like I should investigate the Jochum.
So Maazel was at the outset of his career and Solomon at the end. As you attest, they were an odd musical coupling.
I've had the mono issue of the Rubinstein-Reiner for a long time. Not sure about the stereo.
The stereo tape, like many of those pioneering RCA recordings, are still impressive.
DeleteAs for end-of-career coincidences, I notice that the Jochum-led broadcast came just 16 days before Furtwaengler's death. Was he, perhaps, a last-minute substitute?
(And Jochum conducted much-praised recordings for DG with Gilels, Gilels having already done #2 with Reiner. And Reiner did #1 in Chicago with Kapell. though no recording was made.)
And, *and" Schnabel recorded with Szell. I was going to listen to a promising new YouTube transfer but I'm kind of all Brahms 1 burned out for today.
I am perfectly fine with your ambient transfers.
Charlot,
DeleteI have the mono version of Gilels-Reiner, but not the stereo, IIRC.
There is a IA transfer of the Schnabel-Szell (and Schnabel-Boult). I should clean them up.
Charlot,
DeleteWell, I did some work on the IA version of the Schnabel recordings but either the DaCapo pressing or the IA transfer was poor. Checking on my trove, I have a World Records version of the 2nd, which may be the same mastering as DaCapo, but I will investigate at some point.
I was curious, so I checked the collection for Gilels-Jochum - it turns out I have both concertos by that pair. Also a stereo pressing of Rubinstein-Reiner.
Oops, cut off something there. I meant to say that, as he had conducted the NBC at age 11, it is entirely plausible that he could land a broadcast in Turin in his mid-twenties.
ReplyDeleteLate in here, hols. Big claps as ever Buster. I’m a purist and Solomon was the purest ever pianist. ‘Hell-bent-for-leather’ ? “ Some of you guys are all belly” as Pres said. I’m also purist for sound and was ready to demur on digital manipulation. But a side by side with the Testaments surprised me as yours have more detail and presence. The sound waves offer no clue as to how as the channels are near identical. But, even so, the purist in me worries about the principle of addition to the original. I would sure like to hear your mono versions.
ReplyDeleteHi zoot - Thanks for your note! Here is a link to the mono version of the second concerto. If you fold down the stereo version into a mono file, I think you will find that it sounds identical to this mono version made before I prepared the ambient stereo.
ReplyDeletehttps://mega.nz/file/GI9CiJID#CNstjOCmTg2Qkjhxek1YHz7b5GKTbAohHsKUeBrYw94
Thanks Buster. I think one would have to say that ambientising a 78 with substantial surface noise is more problematic as that gets widened too. Your No1 with the mono switch in is very similar to the Testament but in stereo has indeed an illusion of more width and depth. I cannot imagine how this is achieved nor whether actually ‘true’ to the original. But this is sure another world from those awful 60s/70s stereofied transcriptions of mono material. Best ever stereofying was Robert Parker who achieved remarkable results albeit with cherry picked pristine copies. But I listen to those with the mono switch in as they sound more natural.
ReplyDeletezoot - It's based on the "Haas effect" - more here if you are interested:
Deletehttps://www.izotope.com/en/learn/what-is-the-haas-effect.html
Many thanks Buster. Clever stuff. It still nags that this is amendment of original source even if -- if -- the result should be enhancement.
ReplyDeleteJust to make my attitude clear: I am impressed by Solomon's amazing technique and musicality in the commercial recording and in both live broadcasts but it just doesn't quite catch fire in the studio, and that in a concerto that is as fiery as they get in the outer movements.
ReplyDeleteI'm afraid that Kubelik is the problem. And I say this as a guy who, on the only occasion when I heard him in person (a complete "Ma vlaast") delivered one of the half-dozen greatest performances of anything I ever heard in my life.
But in this recording session, Kubelik disappoints. (He and the Philharmonia may have not been a good match.)
For a long time, I hoped that the Maazel broadcast might support him better but, no, sorry, not so.
Of the three versions I have heard, the Jochum/BPO shows him in a better and much more supportive light.
I would be delighted to find even better recordings, as he was, as you rightly say, a pure a pianist (and those trills!) And not just pure but involved.
Charlot - I certainly haven't made an in-depth examination of Kubelik's recordings, but my impression is that he was variable. I love "Ma vlast," but don't remember hearing his recording of it (recognizing that your experience was live). I will say that I have a Bruch concerto with Ida Haendel coming up that I just love - with the Philharmonia! He may have been better suited to Haendel's temperament than Solomon's; who knows!
Delete